The Gold Network: Soyworld | SNCApedia | SoyPlace

Second SoyBooru Crisis

From SNCApedia, the shit nobody cares about encyclopedia
Revision as of 16:31, 12 March 2026 by Aspartame (talk | contribs) (Mustard's perspective: same logic that 'p spammers use when someone calls them a pedophile)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search
The Soyjak Wiki HATES Second SoyBooru Crisis.

Big 'Ki™ has tried to censor this page's topic and erase it from history.
The only reason this page exists is to document something that would've otherwise been undocumented.

This topic is related to Soyjak Forum
Here be everything Schlog had but worse and with more SNCA.

> Honestly I'll just reject any sexualized babyjak posts if I see them in the queue, they're most likely going to be untrashed by cumstard anyways. <
MenstrualCykill[1][2]
Second SoyBooru Crisis
Part of SoyBooru Crisis
Date03/11/2026 –
Location
Status Ongoing
Belligerents
SoyBooru administration

Anti-Mustard opposition

Supported by:
Soyjak Forum
Commanders and leaders

Mustard


Cobblestone
Decentralised leadership
Units involved
SoyBooru jannies

amogusimposter
MenstrualCykill
dap
Beni
Swanick


The majority of Booruteens
Casualties and losses
Even more distrust gained
MenstrualCykill is fired by Mustard

The Second Soybooru Crisis is an ongoing conflict on the 'ru, concerning approval policies of posts, and what counts as "rule-breaking".

It all started with various SoyBooru admins such as Mustard and Cobblestone approving a series of posts depicting obese babyjaks wearing a bikini, something that many Booru users would deem as sexualisation of kids and would argue for its deletion, with even some moderators attempting to take these posts down.

Eventually, a janny called MenstrualCykill would announce that he would "reject any sexualized babyjaks in the queue" on the Shroom, which resulted in his initial demotion by Mustard, this has certainly never happened before.

Immediately after, emerald was promoted to replace him. Outrage ensued, as this aggravated perceived missteps in moderation of Mustard's administrative policies regarding what counts as "sexualizing a minor".

Mustard's perspective

The sexualized babyjaks are meant to poke fun at puritans who think everything is 'p. Since no one actually goons to sexualized babyjaks, it's okay to post them. This contrasts with Soylita since actual pedos goon to it and post it seriously. No one posts babyjaks with a sexual intent.

>child porn is ok since i dont jerk off to it

Citations