Conservapedia: Difference between revisions
Coalfarmer (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Coalfarmer (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{CIA}}{{Oldfag}}{{Infobox Imageboard Site|date_founded=Nov. 21, 2006 (20 years ago)|major_boards=Top articles: evidence for Christianity, Liberal style, San Francisco Values,|total_posts=50,000 articles as of Late 2025|homepage=https://www.conservapedia.com/Main_Page|creator=Andrew Schlafy|owner=Andrew Schlafy|notable_events=Rob Smith edit war, Rightipedia splnter, Anon edit ban, War with """rational""" wiki, Lenski paper incident,|imageboard_name=Conservapedia}} | {{CIA}}{{Oldfag}}{{RubyShort}}{{Infobox Imageboard Site|date_founded=Nov. 21, 2006 (20 years ago)|major_boards=Top articles: evidence for Christianity, Liberal style, San Francisco Values,|total_posts=50,000 articles as of Late 2025|homepage=https://www.conservapedia.com/Main_Page|creator=Andrew Schlafy|owner=Andrew Schlafy|notable_events=Rob Smith edit war, Rightipedia splnter, Anon edit ban, War with """rational""" wiki, Lenski paper incident,|imageboard_name=Conservapedia}} | ||
Conservapedia is a encyclopedia dramatica like wiki fork but less faggoted and much more serious aldoe being around the same age with it being 20 years old and ED being 22 years old. It has had multiple splinters such as Rightipedia, leftipedia, and """Rational""" wiki. With leftipedia being such a pedocore faggotdump DNB of a site it doesn't even have its own wikipedia page and has gotten raided by /pol/ repeatedly. The leftipedia writer of the soyjak.party article has also been doxxed and looks like a xitter bird soyjak. """rational""" wiki for some reason is seen as an unbiased source for info by faggots and is literally compared to snopes on its own wikipedia page. | Conservapedia is a encyclopedia dramatica like wiki fork but less faggoted and much more serious aldoe being around the same age with it being 20 years old and ED being 22 years old. It has had multiple splinters such as Rightipedia, leftipedia, and """Rational""" wiki. With leftipedia being such a pedocore faggotdump DNB of a site it doesn't even have its own wikipedia page and has gotten raided by /pol/ repeatedly. The leftipedia writer of the soyjak.party article has also been doxxed and looks like a xitter bird soyjak. """rational""" wiki for some reason is seen as an unbiased source for info by faggots and is literally compared to snopes on its own wikipedia page. | ||
Conservapedia's staff has a strange rule and belief that nazi germany (due too the name national socialist) is and was a leftist party so therefore they do not have to cover nazi germany in detail so therefore prevent being called neo nazis. Also so tey can say anti-semitism is a mainly leftist thing in a snarky redditor ben shapiro way. This is a shitlib tactic and is one of the few things un-keyed conservapedia has done. To respond to this, a neo nazi named Eleonóra Dubiczki (namefag: Fiala) gathered multiple metapedia<ref>another right wing wiki similar to rightipedia that is also dead</ref> and conservapedia chud editors and made rightipedia. it was SNCA and DNB and was barely even right wing apart from the nazi shit and defended leftist ideas such as darwinism. | Conservapedia's staff has a strange rule and belief that nazi germany (due too the name national socialist) is and was a leftist party so therefore they do not have to cover nazi germany in detail so therefore prevent being called neo nazis. Also so tey can say anti-semitism is a mainly leftist thing in a snarky redditor ben shapiro way. This is a shitlib tactic and is one of the few things un-keyed conservapedia has done. To respond to this, a neo nazi named Eleonóra Dubiczki (namefag: Fiala) gathered multiple metapedia<ref>another right wing wiki similar to rightipedia that is also dead</ref> and conservapedia chud editors and made rightipedia. it was SNCA and DNB and was barely even right wing apart from the nazi shit and defended leftist ideas such as darwinism. Metapedia itself was just a shitty anti-american version of ED and that's all you need to know about it. | ||
After all this conservapedia is the only of these sites to still exist and thrive to this day. It is an oldfag gem which must be protected. | |||
Revision as of 05:10, 21 January 2026
| Warning! The following may feature disinfo, psy-ops, or other infohazards. | |
| Proceed with caution. |
| All fun out of the pool for oldfag swim! "Don't tase me, bro!"
|
| Foundation | Nov. 21, 2006 (20 years ago) |
|---|---|
| Creator | Andrew Schlafy |
| Owner | Andrew Schlafy |
| Major Boards | Top articles: evidence for Christianity, Liberal style, San Francisco Values, |
| Total posts | 50,000 articles as of Late 2025 |
| Notable Events | Rob Smith edit war, Rightipedia splnter, Anon edit ban, War with """rational""" wiki, Lenski paper incident, |
| Website | https://www.conservapedia.com/Main_Page |
Conservapedia is a encyclopedia dramatica like wiki fork but less faggoted and much more serious aldoe being around the same age with it being 20 years old and ED being 22 years old. It has had multiple splinters such as Rightipedia, leftipedia, and """Rational""" wiki. With leftipedia being such a pedocore faggotdump DNB of a site it doesn't even have its own wikipedia page and has gotten raided by /pol/ repeatedly. The leftipedia writer of the soyjak.party article has also been doxxed and looks like a xitter bird soyjak. """rational""" wiki for some reason is seen as an unbiased source for info by faggots and is literally compared to snopes on its own wikipedia page.
Conservapedia's staff has a strange rule and belief that nazi germany (due too the name national socialist) is and was a leftist party so therefore they do not have to cover nazi germany in detail so therefore prevent being called neo nazis. Also so tey can say anti-semitism is a mainly leftist thing in a snarky redditor ben shapiro way. This is a shitlib tactic and is one of the few things un-keyed conservapedia has done. To respond to this, a neo nazi named Eleonóra Dubiczki (namefag: Fiala) gathered multiple metapedia[1] and conservapedia chud editors and made rightipedia. it was SNCA and DNB and was barely even right wing apart from the nazi shit and defended leftist ideas such as darwinism. Metapedia itself was just a shitty anti-american version of ED and that's all you need to know about it.
After all this conservapedia is the only of these sites to still exist and thrive to this day. It is an oldfag gem which must be protected.
- ↑ another right wing wiki similar to rightipedia that is also dead

