New mission: revamp the portals to make them look actually tolerable to the eye. They are currently placeholders as of now.
The Gold Network: Soyworld | SNCApedia | SoyPlace


I'm not dead, just inactive for the moment. Faggot (talk) 20:16, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

SNCApedia talk:Templates: Difference between revisions

From SNCApedia, the shit nobody cares about encyclopedia
Latest comment: Saturday at 19:00 by Clarification needed in topic Superpedo template
Jump to navigationJump to search
Superpedo template: new section
Line 21: Line 21:


[[User:SomebodyRum|SomebodyRum]] ([[User talk:SomebodyRum|talk]]) 18:45, 11 April 2026 (UTC)
[[User:SomebodyRum|SomebodyRum]] ([[User talk:SomebodyRum|talk]]) 18:45, 11 April 2026 (UTC)
== Superpedo template ==
marge, [[Template:Superpedo]] is not deleted so move it back to the current templates with a warning that it shouldn't be used to describe actual pedophiles, like how the documentation page describes it
one joke article is using this template, so don't delete it again <sup>[[User:Clarification needed|&#91;Clarification needed&#93;]] ([[User talk:Clarification needed|talk]])</sup> 19:00, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:00, 11 April 2026

Just discuss templates that need to be added here.

That's all. SNCAenjoyer671488 (talk) 00:26, 29 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
I have idea for a rating between Brimstone and Vantablack.Let's call it Magma it would for stuff that is worse than brimstone but better than vantablack.2A02:CB80:408B:26AF:FE67:327A:A0DC:51CB 06:50, 10 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

I saw Big 'ki used to have a Branigger template

Does anyone have a 'chive of what that template used to look like? I kinda want to make a template like that for us. Then again, I guess we already have the Chinny template, so I understand if any of (You) think we don't need a Branigger template o algo. SNCAenjoyer671488 (talk) 14:31, 4 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Twitter and chud template already exists, i can see why it was unnecesary. Yaquer200 (talk) 14:45, 4 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Makes sense, I don't think it got archived thoughbeit, and I'm curious as to what it looked like SNCAenjoyer671488 (talk) 14:47, 4 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
it was similar to the twitter one i think, i think it had the classic original branigger and then a mix of other braniggers like a furry branigger, a siege branigger and other braniggger i don't remember right now. Yaquer200 (talk) 15:25, 4 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
you can find in the template ki but i'm working on my version (you should be able to find at Template:Branigger) albeit its really incomplete and need to be reworked with padding removed so its doesnt leak over other template SomebodyRum (talk) 18:43, 11 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

hey i kinda reworked on some template

i was wondering if the blacked template was still considered from the 'ki as i am possibly planning some small modification (biggest one being the bibisi missile)

This snowbunny has been by a huge bibisi!
Consider using bibisi launchers to distract them.

SomebodyRum (talk) 18:45, 11 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Superpedo template

marge, Template:Superpedo is not deleted so move it back to the current templates with a warning that it shouldn't be used to describe actual pedophiles, like how the documentation page describes it

one joke article is using this template, so don't delete it again [Clarification needed] (talk) 19:00, 11 April 2026 (UTC)Reply