Talk:Endchan: Difference between revisions
From SNCApedia, the shit nobody cares about encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 April by Coalfarmer in topic we can't even use it anymore?
Coalfarmer (talk | contribs) |
Anonymous327 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
:Also the /pol/ owner is displeased with our entry on him | :Also the /pol/ owner is displeased with our entry on him | ||
:I can't link to it but check endchan's /news/ board [[User:Coalfarmer|Coalfarmer]] ([[User talk:Coalfarmer|talk]]) 02:26, 9 April 2026 (UTC) | :I can't link to it but check endchan's /news/ board [[User:Coalfarmer|Coalfarmer]] ([[User talk:Coalfarmer|talk]]) 02:26, 9 April 2026 (UTC) | ||
::I don't see a reason to make new enemies, I think we could sort this out diplomatically. Perhaps we could explain the decision to them? I could reply to that thread with the following text: „I am from SNCApedia/Greetings from SNCApedia! Although this decision may come as bewildering, we would like to mention that participation on Endchan is not banned. We're currently discussing a way to separate templates so that endchan and other IBs that have CSAM problems are not confused with sites run by pedophiles. This is truly an unfortunate situation for both communities, and the decision is not to be considered an act of hostility.”. Tell me if I should and ifI should change something. | |||
Revision as of 11:48, 9 April 2026
Gem?
EndChan has saved the party like 3 times during the splintered age and other catastrophes
not to mention they also saved 8 other SNCA splinters when they went down like the shemmy, cricky, etc. Coalfarmer (talk) 14:52, 14 February 2026 (UTC)
remove this
endchan jannies are very incompetence and they are rarely active which leads to a lot of CP spammed especially during nighttime
it also doesn't really have a whole lot of affiliation with the soysphere Yoot (talk) 16:03, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
- Endchan notably has a strong soyjak presence due to the shemmy and kuzzy bunkers, unfortunaly most altchans due to how dead nigger they are they don't have this MPA system since it would take hours for a janny to go and approve images, I'm pretty sure there are also another sites that aren't really that soy related but we still allow them, and pretty sure most altchans have been suffering of this problem for years at this point. Yaquer200 (talk) 16:07, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
- but the issue is that advertising the site as a bunker encourages people to use it
- for example if you saw a page about some altchan named 7272chan, your first instinct would not be to go and check what's in it, however since endchan is advertised as a bunker it makes it more likely for people to feel like they should check what it is
- also one if their most active boards (think its named /agartha2/) literally allows talking about underage egirls and how you want to goon to them/you're in possession of CSAM or nude photos related to them as long as you don't explain how to obtain CP, I literally saw a link of someone sharing a nudes of a 14 year old that stayed up for i kid you not 4 DAYS, i think we shouldn't keep pages related or mention endchan as it quite literally both enables pedophilia and is full of incompetent and inactive jannies which delete CP after hours of wait Yoot (talk) 16:28, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
- 8cuck type shithole, okay I will censor it real quick. Yaquer200 (talk) 16:33, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
we can't even use it anymore?
I know we can't link to it anymore since the p' spam on the dead boards is so bad but i use the popular /pol/ boards which are actually moderated
do i have to quit using them or...?
-coalfarmer
- Maybe have a template which merely prohibits linking to the site but participation can still be allowed. Can be used on pages like dnb.party (doe we don't the into about the owner) Gemmy1488cob (talk) 01:41, 9 April 2026 (UTC)
- alright
- maybe just add a warning?
- Also the /pol/ owner is displeased with our entry on him
- I can't link to it but check endchan's /news/ board Coalfarmer (talk) 02:26, 9 April 2026 (UTC)
- I don't see a reason to make new enemies, I think we could sort this out diplomatically. Perhaps we could explain the decision to them? I could reply to that thread with the following text: „I am from SNCApedia/Greetings from SNCApedia! Although this decision may come as bewildering, we would like to mention that participation on Endchan is not banned. We're currently discussing a way to separate templates so that endchan and other IBs that have CSAM problems are not confused with sites run by pedophiles. This is truly an unfortunate situation for both communities, and the decision is not to be considered an act of hostility.”. Tell me if I should and ifI should change something.