The Gold Network: Soyworld | SNCApedia | SoyPlace


Talk:MarketPliers: Difference between revisions

From SNCApedia, the shit nobody cares about encyclopedia
Latest comment: Yesterday at 17:51 by Clarification needed in topic Can y'all stop edit warring and discuss here instead
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
Line 11: Line 11:
::He said he didn't want to be seen as a pedophile on IRC. He was also pissed at Vantared for adding [[:Template:PossiblyPedo]] to the page. [[User:A|A]] ([[User talk:A|talk]]) 03:36, 26 March 2026 (UTC)
::He said he didn't want to be seen as a pedophile on IRC. He was also pissed at Vantared for adding [[:Template:PossiblyPedo]] to the page. [[User:A|A]] ([[User talk:A|talk]]) 03:36, 26 March 2026 (UTC)
:::Averiniggers already have a bad reputation and it doesn't help the fact he sends weird furry art specifically to underage users and being a furry tranny is already a hate guarantee by the majority of soyteens much more if he is a janny on the wiki, I think he should have seen coming these allegations from people (take for example cobbletroon) , for a person that says he is an unbothered fur"ARYAN" him and North clittyleak a lot geg. [[User:Yaquer200|Yaquer200]] ([[User talk:Yaquer200|talk]]) 03:54, 26 March 2026 (UTC)
:::Averiniggers already have a bad reputation and it doesn't help the fact he sends weird furry art specifically to underage users and being a furry tranny is already a hate guarantee by the majority of soyteens much more if he is a janny on the wiki, I think he should have seen coming these allegations from people (take for example cobbletroon) , for a person that says he is an unbothered fur"ARYAN" him and North clittyleak a lot geg. [[User:Yaquer200|Yaquer200]] ([[User talk:Yaquer200|talk]]) 03:54, 26 March 2026 (UTC)
::::{{Greentext|>He was also pissed at Vantared for adding Template:PossiblyPedo to the page}}
::::{{Greentext|>doesn't help the fact he sends weird furry art specifically to underage users}}
::::I could just leave the PossiblyPedo template for this, but for unbiased sake i'll just keep it removed for now.
::::Adding the controversial template too, considering no one has reached a consensus yet and the edit warring happening earlier. <sup>[[User:Clarification needed|&#91;Clarification needed&#93;]] ([[User talk:Clarification needed|talk]])</sup> 17:51, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:51, 26 March 2026

Can y'all stop edit warring and discuss here instead

[edit source]

title
<Pretty please? We can just talk this out 🥺 [Clarification needed] (talk) 01:05, 26 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

I already knew having this furnigger would bring problems, the only weird thing is that the thing @A said.
> Leakage, plus Market wants it gone
Did Market told you anything about that @A ?
for the rest, @Brimstone or any other user that hates him, stop putting yourself in the page and put things that actually happened, I wouldn't call him a pedophile, not even a suspected one, just some weird tranny at most. Yaquer200 (talk) 03:30, 26 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
>Did Market told you anything about that?
He said he didn't want to be seen as a pedophile on IRC. He was also pissed at Vantared for adding Template:PossiblyPedo to the page. A (talk) 03:36, 26 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Averiniggers already have a bad reputation and it doesn't help the fact he sends weird furry art specifically to underage users and being a furry tranny is already a hate guarantee by the majority of soyteens much more if he is a janny on the wiki, I think he should have seen coming these allegations from people (take for example cobbletroon) , for a person that says he is an unbothered fur"ARYAN" him and North clittyleak a lot geg. Yaquer200 (talk) 03:54, 26 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

>He was also pissed at Vantared for adding Template:PossiblyPedo to the page

>doesn't help the fact he sends weird furry art specifically to underage users

I could just leave the PossiblyPedo template for this, but for unbiased sake i'll just keep it removed for now.
Adding the controversial template too, considering no one has reached a consensus yet and the edit warring happening earlier. [Clarification needed] (talk) 17:51, 26 March 2026 (UTC)Reply