Talk:SNCApedia (detractor perspective): Difference between revisions
From SNCApedia, the shit nobody cares about encyclopedia
Latest comment: 02:04 by Clarification needed in topic >delet dis cuz not needed!!!!!!
Merge edit by 190.163.36.156 Tag: merged edit of another user |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
It's also related to this 'pedia after all, so why even delete it? It's not "too SNCA". Nothing is not too SNCA, not even [[Mango|mangoes]]. | It's also related to this 'pedia after all, so why even delete it? It's not "too SNCA". Nothing is not too SNCA, not even [[Mango|mangoes]]. | ||
There's a reason why the [[Template:Delete]] exists, to '''DISCUSS''' why it should be deleted in the first place. <sup>[[User:Clarification needed|[Clarification needed]]] ([[User talk:Clarification needed|talk]])</sup> 01:43, 31 March 2026 (UTC) | There's a reason why the [[Template:Delete]] exists, to '''DISCUSS''' why it should be deleted in the first place. <sup>[[User:Clarification needed|[Clarification needed]]] ([[User talk:Clarification needed|talk]])</sup> 01:43, 31 March 2026 (UTC) | ||
:@[[User:Editor|Editor]], I need reasons on why you even deleted it in the first place. | |||
:@[[User:Coalfarmer|Coalfarmer]], [https://soyjakwiki.org/User:Coalfarmer#:~:text=there%20was%20more%20here%20but%20certain%20faggots%20hate%20fun For a guy that wanted the 'ki to be fun], surely you don't like fun in here as well so you need to explain as well. | |||
:I understand that you both have hate boners for how the big 'ki is (shittily) being administrated, but <b>both of you don't have to clittyleak over an ounce of criticism towards the 'pedia</b>. We're not perfect after all, but at least we're trying to be informative of what the big 'ki is censoring. <sup>[[User:Clarification needed|[Clarification needed]]] ([[User talk:Clarification needed|talk]])</sup> 02:04, 31 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:04, 31 March 2026
Delte, youknow why
[edit source]no, i dont know why, why?
- coalfarmer is a leaky nigger who can't come up with a valid reason to delete this page 2A0D:BBC7:0:0:F816:3EFF:FE18:F410 00:23, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
>delet dis cuz not needed!!!!!!
[edit source]I'm sure as shit that "Article (alternative perspective)" is a trending joke (or sometimes truth nukes) in the big 'ki, so I don't see harm in having this article here.
Why else it has thrembillions of Kuz articles in under different perspectives?
It's also related to this 'pedia after all, so why even delete it? It's not "too SNCA". Nothing is not too SNCA, not even mangoes.
There's a reason why the Template:Delete exists, to DISCUSS why it should be deleted in the first place. [Clarification needed] (talk) 01:43, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Editor, I need reasons on why you even deleted it in the first place.
- @Coalfarmer, For a guy that wanted the 'ki to be fun, surely you don't like fun in here as well so you need to explain as well.
- I understand that you both have hate boners for how the big 'ki is (shittily) being administrated, but both of you don't have to clittyleak over an ounce of criticism towards the 'pedia. We're not perfect after all, but at least we're trying to be informative of what the big 'ki is censoring. [Clarification needed] (talk) 02:04, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
