Talk:Cobblestone: Difference between revisions
| (11 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
::::Unrelated but is Cobblestone's IP italian? --[[User:SECA Enthusiast|SECA Enthusiast]] ([[User talk:SECA Enthusiast|talk]]) 19:24, 17 March 2026 (UTC) | ::::Unrelated but is Cobblestone's IP italian? --[[User:SECA Enthusiast|SECA Enthusiast]] ([[User talk:SECA Enthusiast|talk]]) 19:24, 17 March 2026 (UTC) | ||
:::::cobblestone uses an analbanian VPN [[User:Yaquer200|Yaquer200]] ([[User talk:Yaquer200|talk]]) 19:37, 17 March 2026 (UTC) | :::::cobblestone uses an analbanian VPN [[User:Yaquer200|Yaquer200]] ([[User talk:Yaquer200|talk]]) 19:37, 17 March 2026 (UTC) | ||
:::So you won’t allow a page on Antioch but you allow fucking {{Antimattertext|Babyjak porn}}? | |||
:::This is why I hate Quoteism. [[User:Channel of the Sith|Channel of the Sith]] ([[User talk:Channel of the Sith|talk]]) 20:04, 17 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
::::At the very least we have a page Robert Palmater. [[User:Bob|Bob]] ([[User talk:Bob|talk]]) 20:47, 17 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
:::::[[Sharty:Morshu|Morshu]] reads the Book of Mormon! [[User:Channel of the Sith|Channel of the Sith]] ([[User talk:Channel of the Sith|talk]]) 22:19, 17 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
== ban her == | |||
@[[User:Bob|Bob]] @[[User:Editor|Editor]] @[[User:Yaquer200|Yaquer200]]<nowiki/>why is she allowed even as an approver if shes a pedo which this article proves? ban her for pedophilia or at the very least fire her | |||
she isn't active, she doesn't tamper any page and she used to help this wiki, as much I hate her shitty decisions we cannot ban her for nothing at all. [[User:Yaquer200|Yaquer200]] ([[User talk:Yaquer200|talk]]) 05:38, 20 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
== Should we make the old "Cobblestone's Dictatorship" page into a section on this one? == | |||
I always thought that page would've made more sense as a section in this very article, since this page shockingly doesn't have much content to it, but it looks like the "Cobblestone's Dictatorship" page got 'nished. Are there any 'chives o algo? [[User:SNCAenjoyer671488|SNCAenjoyer671488]] ([[User talk:SNCAenjoyer671488|talk]]) 19:29, 21 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
:What do you think? Yes. Just take the parts of the article that aren't spergy nonsense and take the things that do make sense [[User:Bob|Bob]] ([[User talk:Bob|talk]]) 19:54, 21 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
::i think the article is good as it is, it criticizes cobblestone well, I dislike cobblestone but that article (the cobblestone dictatorship one) was shitty and was essentially just a spergout [[User:G-Man|G-Man]] ([[User talk:G-Man|talk]]) 19:58, 21 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
:::The article is just a rehashed of the Sharty's Cobblestone detractor perspective with a bit more sperginess added in there. It doesn't focus on everything Cobblestone actually did, kind of making it go against the Quote is a nigger policy or whatever it's called. [[User:Bob|Bob]] ([[User talk:Bob|talk]]) 20:04, 21 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
::::i found the archive: | |||
::::https://voidbin.com/paste/40894da6-a2c2-4b13-a1f1-2e4d8546fb4b | |||
::::tbh it has some things that should be added like SNCApedia being barred from mentioning on the 'ki, but I think the rest is unnecessary | |||
::::Things that were mentioned in that article are already mentioned like memoryholing and the gradingcaust, and the rest is mostly coalfarmer's spergings and he selfinserting himself on the article | |||
::::[[User:G-Man|G-Man]] ([[User talk:G-Man|talk]]) 20:28, 21 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
:::::I added the memoryholing parts to that article geg. Maybe SNCApedia should be mentioned but also make sure to mention the why. It's because it links to Chinny/Swinny and other hostile to the Sharty splinter's URLs. [[User:Bob|Bob]] ([[User talk:Bob|talk]]) 20:43, 21 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:43, 21 March 2026
| This is the talk page for discussing Cobblestone and anything related to its purposes and tasks. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
|
Wanna add a new topic? Click here! -> [+] |
No talk page?
[edit source]I can fix that ou algo assim SNCAenjoyer671488 (talk) 00:37, 15 March 2026 (UTC)
- add the template Coalfarmer (talk) 00:40, 15 March 2026 (UTC)
- >add the template
- Marge... SNCAenjoyer671488 (talk) 00:40, 15 March 2026 (UTC)
- can you not edit the page or some shit? Bob (talk) 00:53, 15 March 2026 (UTC)
- i was busy i had to take my dog to the vet Coalfarmer (talk) 01:24, 15 March 2026 (UTC)
exporting a bunch of pages
[edit source]Marge since when? It's mostly been Sawoot who's done that. Bob (talk) 07:40, 15 March 2026 (UTC)
- who
- also where does it mention that Coalfarmer (talk) 07:59, 15 March 2026 (UTC)
What was linked in the supressed revisions?
[edit source]Marge --SECA Enthusiast (talk) 19:18, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
- babyjak goatse, I replaced it with a censored archive. Bob (talk) 19:21, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
- >babyjak goatse
- What the fuck Yaquer200 (talk) 19:22, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
- it had like a dildo pacifier next to it if that makes sense. Bob (talk) 19:23, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
- Unrelated but is Cobblestone's IP italian? --SECA Enthusiast (talk) 19:24, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
- cobblestone uses an analbanian VPN Yaquer200 (talk) 19:37, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
- Unrelated but is Cobblestone's IP italian? --SECA Enthusiast (talk) 19:24, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
- So you won’t allow a page on Antioch but you allow fucking Babyjak porn
? - This is why I hate Quoteism. Channel of the Sith (talk) 20:04, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
- At the very least we have a page Robert Palmater. Bob (talk) 20:47, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
- Morshu reads the Book of Mormon! Channel of the Sith (talk) 22:19, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
- At the very least we have a page Robert Palmater. Bob (talk) 20:47, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
- it had like a dildo pacifier next to it if that makes sense. Bob (talk) 19:23, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
ban her
[edit source]@Bob @Editor @Yaquer200why is she allowed even as an approver if shes a pedo which this article proves? ban her for pedophilia or at the very least fire her
she isn't active, she doesn't tamper any page and she used to help this wiki, as much I hate her shitty decisions we cannot ban her for nothing at all. Yaquer200 (talk) 05:38, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
Should we make the old "Cobblestone's Dictatorship" page into a section on this one?
[edit source]I always thought that page would've made more sense as a section in this very article, since this page shockingly doesn't have much content to it, but it looks like the "Cobblestone's Dictatorship" page got 'nished. Are there any 'chives o algo? SNCAenjoyer671488 (talk) 19:29, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
- What do you think? Yes. Just take the parts of the article that aren't spergy nonsense and take the things that do make sense Bob (talk) 19:54, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
- i think the article is good as it is, it criticizes cobblestone well, I dislike cobblestone but that article (the cobblestone dictatorship one) was shitty and was essentially just a spergout G-Man (talk) 19:58, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
- The article is just a rehashed of the Sharty's Cobblestone detractor perspective with a bit more sperginess added in there. It doesn't focus on everything Cobblestone actually did, kind of making it go against the Quote is a nigger policy or whatever it's called. Bob (talk) 20:04, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
- i found the archive:
- https://voidbin.com/paste/40894da6-a2c2-4b13-a1f1-2e4d8546fb4b
- tbh it has some things that should be added like SNCApedia being barred from mentioning on the 'ki, but I think the rest is unnecessary
- Things that were mentioned in that article are already mentioned like memoryholing and the gradingcaust, and the rest is mostly coalfarmer's spergings and he selfinserting himself on the article
- G-Man (talk) 20:28, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
- I added the memoryholing parts to that article geg. Maybe SNCApedia should be mentioned but also make sure to mention the why. It's because it links to Chinny/Swinny and other hostile to the Sharty splinter's URLs. Bob (talk) 20:43, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
- The article is just a rehashed of the Sharty's Cobblestone detractor perspective with a bit more sperginess added in there. It doesn't focus on everything Cobblestone actually did, kind of making it go against the Quote is a nigger policy or whatever it's called. Bob (talk) 20:04, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
- i think the article is good as it is, it criticizes cobblestone well, I dislike cobblestone but that article (the cobblestone dictatorship one) was shitty and was essentially just a spergout G-Man (talk) 19:58, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
