SNCApedia talk:Quote is a nigger: Difference between revisions
From SNCApedia, the shit nobody cares about encyclopedia
Latest comment: 19 minutes ago by Bob in topic shit page
→shit page: Reply |
→shit page: Reply |
||
| (33 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
anyone remember when quotecord hate was actually good? [[User:Bob|Bob]] ([[User talk:Bob|talk]]) 04:25, 28 February 2026 (UTC) | anyone remember when quotecord hate was actually good? [[User:Bob|Bob]] ([[User talk:Bob|talk]]) 04:25, 28 February 2026 (UTC) | ||
^ quotecord shill above me, bob is the name of a meme currently being forced by quotecord | |||
:Meds it has potential, it just needs some work, that's all [[User:SNCAenjoyer671488|SNCAenjoyer671488]] ([[User talk:SNCAenjoyer671488|talk]]) 17:22, 14 March 2026 (UTC) | :Meds it has potential, it just needs some work, that's all [[User:SNCAenjoyer671488|SNCAenjoyer671488]] ([[User talk:SNCAenjoyer671488|talk]]) 17:22, 14 March 2026 (UTC) | ||
::if the cobblestone dictatorship page gest deleted this page should too [[User:Coalfarmer|Coalfarmer]] ([[User talk:Coalfarmer|talk]]) 17:28, 14 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
:::Why? The page serves a purpose and it would be a good addition to help remind users to dequotify pages, just needs a couple edits to help fix it. [[User:Bob|Bob]] ([[User talk:Bob|talk]]) 21:36, 14 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
::::ok then add back the cobblestone page faggot its basically the same thing [[User:Coalfarmer|Coalfarmer]] ([[User talk:Coalfarmer|talk]]) 21:39, 14 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
:::::No, may I direct you [[Cobblestone|somewhere else]] [[User:Bob|Bob]] ([[User talk:Bob|talk]]) 21:40, 14 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
::::::if i were to make this page you would hate it | |||
::::::thats how it is with you | |||
::::::your obsessed and hopelessly defending a fat brown pooner and a fetal alcohol syndrome stricken pedophile. [[User:Coalfarmer|Coalfarmer]] ([[User talk:Coalfarmer|talk]]) 21:41, 14 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
:::::::I would complement you on making a good contribution to the site. [[User:Bob|Bob]] ([[User talk:Bob|talk]]) 21:44, 14 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
::::::::sure [[User:Coalfarmer|Coalfarmer]] ([[User talk:Coalfarmer|talk]]) 21:55, 14 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
::i suspect (keyword being suspect) that bob is a quotecord shill given that he keeps removing my 'toss and he tried to bury some shit, also no mediator in their right mind would approve softcore 'p, it had to be a higher up or their ass would have likely been demoted. [[User:Aspartame|Aspartame]] ([[User talk:Aspartame|talk]]) 17:29, 14 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
:::he's name is idklchud on the shroom and brapper 90001 on onion farms | |||
:::all he does is make fun of splinters and defend quote and the loli which he approves on the booru | |||
:::he is most definitely a shill [[User:Coalfarmer|Coalfarmer]] ([[User talk:Coalfarmer|talk]]) 17:35, 14 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
::::just as i expected, jannies ban this quotecord propaganda monkey {{bantext|NQVV.}} [[User:Aspartame|Aspartame]] ([[User talk:Aspartame|talk]]) 17:39, 14 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
:::::he is currently defending quote with the help of a chinnypedo | |||
:::::https://www.onionfarms.com/threads/splinter-outer-mid-soysphere-general.9095/post-197900 [[User:Coalfarmer|Coalfarmer]] ([[User talk:Coalfarmer|talk]]) 17:53, 14 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
::::bob literally is the best editor on here geg, you two literally just brap up the entire site compared to him | |||
:::::he defends pedophiles and loli posted on the booru? who cares that he's a good editor are you fucking retarded jesus | |||
::::::Marge? ^^^ [[User:Thougher|Thougher]] ([[User talk:Thougher|talk]]) 17:54, 14 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
:::::check the onion farms thread and my conversation with him | |||
:::::[[Talk:Cobblestone's Dictatorship|Talk:Cobblestone's Dictatorship - SNCApedia]] | |||
:::::https://www.onionfarms.com/threads/splinter-outer-mid-soysphere-general.9095/post-197900 [[User:Coalfarmer|Coalfarmer]] ([[User talk:Coalfarmer|talk]]) 17:55, 14 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
:::::I'm permabanned on the booru, I think you are just seeing a similar-named individual and thinking its me. I got my account banned because I VPNfagged while being not trusted and even than I never even used it. I hate the current state of the booru and literally made the Derpson page calling it the nu-soylita. [[User:Bob|Bob]] ([[User talk:Bob|talk]]) 21:16, 14 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
:::::geg i just read the entire thread there are literally 0 instances of him defending lolicon just go back to editing pages of the biggest snca instead of beefing with others geg | |||
::::::he says that babyjak porn isnt loli and your just him samefagging anyway | |||
:::::::Why are you hallucinating Coalfarmer? Where quote some text for the uninformed instead of making shit up [[User:Bob|Bob]] ([[User talk:Bob|talk]]) 21:19, 14 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
::::>Shroom | |||
::::>"hates splinters" | |||
::::My nigga I am literally known as the one Swinny user on the Shroom. Sure my opinions on most splinters have declined but thats just because there aren't many ones that are good/perfect like this site is. I've used the Gitty, Kuzzy, Swinny, Zarty, Shroom, to a small extent even Chaddy and Sloppy. I am a very active splinter user and I am proud to be one. I used to defend the Swinny on the site before I saw firsthand the decline in quality of the site into what it is now which is occassionally good, didn't help that I learnt of Sverigram. [[User:Bob|Bob]] ([[User talk:Bob|talk]]) 21:32, 14 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
:::Because its bad, you say it's Quote approving shit and your argument of "sexualizing children" isn't even the case as Bernkastel is an adult, sure she has the 1000 years old thing but let me remind you. The way we BTFO pedophiles on lolicon is through the appearance of a loli, that is if it looks like a child, it is a child, doesn't matter if you ad some arbitary number to it it is a child. Now applying that logic, if it looks like an adult it is an adult, there are pretty clear distinctions between a child and an adult wouldn't you agree? [[User:Bob|Bob]] ([[User talk:Bob|talk]]) 21:25, 14 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
::::you are making the exact same argument as him word for word | |||
::::why cant you just say "yes babyjak porn is bad" instead of letting it stay as this "grey area" | |||
::::its very suspicious and shows your true character [[User:Coalfarmer|Coalfarmer]] ([[User talk:Coalfarmer|talk]]) 21:38, 14 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
:::::Babyjak porn is bad, why would you think I believe this from that point I made? [[User:Bob|Bob]] ([[User talk:Bob|talk]]) 21:39, 14 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
::::::you are defending it right now. [[User:Coalfarmer|Coalfarmer]] ([[User talk:Coalfarmer|talk]]) 21:40, 14 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
:::::::how [[User:Bob|Bob]] ([[User talk:Bob|talk]]) 21:40, 14 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
::::::::your saying that the babyjak doesn't look like a baby which is untrue [[User:Coalfarmer|Coalfarmer]] ([[User talk:Coalfarmer|talk]]) 21:42, 14 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::I never said that, I think your making a logical falacy, if a character is canonically a child or meant to depict a child, used in sexual scenarios that is wrong and pedophilic. I think you are being extremely disingeneous and warping what I am saying. [[User:Bob|Bob]] ([[User talk:Bob|talk]]) 21:47, 14 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
::::::::::i think your defending morally wrong ideals and you know it [[User:Coalfarmer|Coalfarmer]] ([[User talk:Coalfarmer|talk]]) 21:55, 14 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::::hating pedophiles is morally wrong? Is that why you keep them on your site? [[User:Bob|Bob]] ([[User talk:Bob|talk]]) 21:58, 14 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
::::::::::::bob | |||
::::::::::::you are defending both quote and cobblestone two people which are arguable either pedophiles or pedophilic sympathizers | |||
::::::::::::your doing this knowingly but that is bad faith so i will assume you aren't | |||
::::::::::::and i do not allow pedophiles on my site. | |||
::::::::::::infact i had to ban about 8 today who tried to spam loli [[User:Coalfarmer|Coalfarmer]] ([[User talk:Coalfarmer|talk]]) 22:01, 14 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::::::>and i do not allow pedophiles on my site. | |||
:::::::::::::>Smoot | |||
:::::::::::::>TerrorByte | |||
:::::::::::::come on bruh | |||
:::::::::::::>you are defending both quote and cobblestone two people which are arguable either pedophiles or pedophilic | |||
:::::::::::::I hate it when people be disingenuous and obsessed. I hate these people yes absolutely. What you people do is the equivalent of this. | |||
:::::::::::::>Kuz is Max | |||
:::::::::::::<Hey Kuz isn't Max actually that's bullshit. | |||
:::::::::::::>Ooooooooy Kuzcord shill your literally defending a pedophile | |||
:::::::::::::<What no I'm not, I think he is a pedophile | |||
:::::::::::::>Nooooooo you literally are jannies ban him for being Kuzcord. [[User:Bob|Bob]] ([[User talk:Bob|talk]]) 22:20, 14 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
:::::::your only arguments are just fucking "you are x", "x is pedophile", "you are x samefagging" nigger i'm just a reader of the wiki that agrees with him geg | |||
:::::::{{q|>nooooo a guy with fucking stubble and a pacifier is fucking lolicon!!!}} are you hearing yourself geg | |||
::::::::say whatever you want i do not care. im not arguing with someone who thinks a "babyjak" its a child. especially not one who is fine with porn of that child. | |||
Latest revision as of 22:20, 14 March 2026
shit page
[edit source]anyone remember when quotecord hate was actually good? Bob (talk) 04:25, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
^ quotecord shill above me, bob is the name of a meme currently being forced by quotecord
- Meds it has potential, it just needs some work, that's all SNCAenjoyer671488 (talk) 17:22, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- if the cobblestone dictatorship page gest deleted this page should too Coalfarmer (talk) 17:28, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- Why? The page serves a purpose and it would be a good addition to help remind users to dequotify pages, just needs a couple edits to help fix it. Bob (talk) 21:36, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- ok then add back the cobblestone page faggot its basically the same thing Coalfarmer (talk) 21:39, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- No, may I direct you somewhere else Bob (talk) 21:40, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- if i were to make this page you would hate it
- thats how it is with you
- your obsessed and hopelessly defending a fat brown pooner and a fetal alcohol syndrome stricken pedophile. Coalfarmer (talk) 21:41, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- I would complement you on making a good contribution to the site. Bob (talk) 21:44, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- No, may I direct you somewhere else Bob (talk) 21:40, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- ok then add back the cobblestone page faggot its basically the same thing Coalfarmer (talk) 21:39, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- Why? The page serves a purpose and it would be a good addition to help remind users to dequotify pages, just needs a couple edits to help fix it. Bob (talk) 21:36, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- i suspect (keyword being suspect) that bob is a quotecord shill given that he keeps removing my 'toss and he tried to bury some shit, also no mediator in their right mind would approve softcore 'p, it had to be a higher up or their ass would have likely been demoted. Aspartame (talk) 17:29, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- he's name is idklchud on the shroom and brapper 90001 on onion farms
- all he does is make fun of splinters and defend quote and the loli which he approves on the booru
- he is most definitely a shill Coalfarmer (talk) 17:35, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- just as i expected, jannies ban this quotecord propaganda monkey NQVV. Aspartame (talk) 17:39, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- he is currently defending quote with the help of a chinnypedo
- https://www.onionfarms.com/threads/splinter-outer-mid-soysphere-general.9095/post-197900 Coalfarmer (talk) 17:53, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- just as i expected, jannies ban this quotecord propaganda monkey NQVV. Aspartame (talk) 17:39, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- if the cobblestone dictatorship page gest deleted this page should too Coalfarmer (talk) 17:28, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- bob literally is the best editor on here geg, you two literally just brap up the entire site compared to him
- he defends pedophiles and loli posted on the booru? who cares that he's a good editor are you fucking retarded jesus
- Marge? ^^^ Thougher (talk) 17:54, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- check the onion farms thread and my conversation with him
- Talk:Cobblestone's Dictatorship - SNCApedia
- https://www.onionfarms.com/threads/splinter-outer-mid-soysphere-general.9095/post-197900 Coalfarmer (talk) 17:55, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- I'm permabanned on the booru, I think you are just seeing a similar-named individual and thinking its me. I got my account banned because I VPNfagged while being not trusted and even than I never even used it. I hate the current state of the booru and literally made the Derpson page calling it the nu-soylita. Bob (talk) 21:16, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- geg i just read the entire thread there are literally 0 instances of him defending lolicon just go back to editing pages of the biggest snca instead of beefing with others geg
- he says that babyjak porn isnt loli and your just him samefagging anyway
- Why are you hallucinating Coalfarmer? Where quote some text for the uninformed instead of making shit up Bob (talk) 21:19, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- he says that babyjak porn isnt loli and your just him samefagging anyway
- he defends pedophiles and loli posted on the booru? who cares that he's a good editor are you fucking retarded jesus
- >Shroom
- >"hates splinters"
- My nigga I am literally known as the one Swinny user on the Shroom. Sure my opinions on most splinters have declined but thats just because there aren't many ones that are good/perfect like this site is. I've used the Gitty, Kuzzy, Swinny, Zarty, Shroom, to a small extent even Chaddy and Sloppy. I am a very active splinter user and I am proud to be one. I used to defend the Swinny on the site before I saw firsthand the decline in quality of the site into what it is now which is occassionally good, didn't help that I learnt of Sverigram. Bob (talk) 21:32, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- bob literally is the best editor on here geg, you two literally just brap up the entire site compared to him
- Because its bad, you say it's Quote approving shit and your argument of "sexualizing children" isn't even the case as Bernkastel is an adult, sure she has the 1000 years old thing but let me remind you. The way we BTFO pedophiles on lolicon is through the appearance of a loli, that is if it looks like a child, it is a child, doesn't matter if you ad some arbitary number to it it is a child. Now applying that logic, if it looks like an adult it is an adult, there are pretty clear distinctions between a child and an adult wouldn't you agree? Bob (talk) 21:25, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- you are making the exact same argument as him word for word
- why cant you just say "yes babyjak porn is bad" instead of letting it stay as this "grey area"
- its very suspicious and shows your true character Coalfarmer (talk) 21:38, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- Babyjak porn is bad, why would you think I believe this from that point I made? Bob (talk) 21:39, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- you are defending it right now. Coalfarmer (talk) 21:40, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- how Bob (talk) 21:40, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- your saying that the babyjak doesn't look like a baby which is untrue Coalfarmer (talk) 21:42, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- I never said that, I think your making a logical falacy, if a character is canonically a child or meant to depict a child, used in sexual scenarios that is wrong and pedophilic. I think you are being extremely disingeneous and warping what I am saying. Bob (talk) 21:47, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- i think your defending morally wrong ideals and you know it Coalfarmer (talk) 21:55, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- hating pedophiles is morally wrong? Is that why you keep them on your site? Bob (talk) 21:58, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- bob
- you are defending both quote and cobblestone two people which are arguable either pedophiles or pedophilic sympathizers
- your doing this knowingly but that is bad faith so i will assume you aren't
- and i do not allow pedophiles on my site.
- infact i had to ban about 8 today who tried to spam loli Coalfarmer (talk) 22:01, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- >and i do not allow pedophiles on my site.
- >Smoot
- >TerrorByte
- come on bruh
- >you are defending both quote and cobblestone two people which are arguable either pedophiles or pedophilic
- I hate it when people be disingenuous and obsessed. I hate these people yes absolutely. What you people do is the equivalent of this.
- >Kuz is Max
- <Hey Kuz isn't Max actually that's bullshit.
- >Ooooooooy Kuzcord shill your literally defending a pedophile
- <What no I'm not, I think he is a pedophile
- >Nooooooo you literally are jannies ban him for being Kuzcord. Bob (talk) 22:20, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- hating pedophiles is morally wrong? Is that why you keep them on your site? Bob (talk) 21:58, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- i think your defending morally wrong ideals and you know it Coalfarmer (talk) 21:55, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- I never said that, I think your making a logical falacy, if a character is canonically a child or meant to depict a child, used in sexual scenarios that is wrong and pedophilic. I think you are being extremely disingeneous and warping what I am saying. Bob (talk) 21:47, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- your saying that the babyjak doesn't look like a baby which is untrue Coalfarmer (talk) 21:42, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- your only arguments are just fucking "you are x", "x is pedophile", "you are x samefagging" nigger i'm just a reader of the wiki that agrees with him geg
- >nooooo a guy with fucking stubble and a pacifier is fucking lolicon!!! are you hearing yourself geg
- say whatever you want i do not care. im not arguing with someone who thinks a "babyjak" its a child. especially not one who is fine with porn of that child.
- how Bob (talk) 21:40, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- you are defending it right now. Coalfarmer (talk) 21:40, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- Babyjak porn is bad, why would you think I believe this from that point I made? Bob (talk) 21:39, 14 March 2026 (UTC)