Talk:Kuzzy

bunker

should we REALLY link to that place? they post child gore and soylita occasionally Coalfarmer (talk) 10:24, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Nigga there is no child gore, that’s only occassionally spammed by chinnyshits. Bob (talk) 10:27, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

>nu kuzzycucks are just mutted versions of chinny and kuzzy culture Gemmy1488cob (talk) 10:31, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

this Coalfarmer (talk) 10:31, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

why do you have such a boner for the kuzzy

constantly defending it on the shemmy and onion farms

the bunker had loli of kuz raping soylita

your defending that? Really? Coalfarmer (talk) 10:31, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

The Kuzzy was a fine splinter to use if you ignored the porn issue, ironic pedophilia was actually being tackled unlike Chinny’s pathetic attempts, and by August they were non-existent, things were looking bright.

The bunker has no jannies, of course there is going to be gross ass shit on it, not defending it but it is not at all like the many pedophilic bunkers like the ones on 8chan. And that might be because there’s an actual proper community in a positive/valuable sense still on it.

I don’t think we should censor the bunker, seems unneccessary imo unlike with the current domain due to Chinny. Bob (talk) 11:54, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

>we gotta censor dem chinnypedos with a fully moderated site but we don't have to censor the unmoderated kuzzy shit hole

logic doesn't work Coalfarmer (talk) 12:19, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

that place has been in complete anarchy since the kuzzy shut down, I honestly don't know why is even still in place, they should have shut it down because there's nothing happening other than failtrolls trying to bait the 5 kuzzycacas that still use it or whine some random crap about the Quotecord owned sites. Yaquer200 (talk) 10:37, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

true I don't think we should drive traffic to it Coalfarmer (talk) 10:49, 3 April 2026 (UTC)