SNCApedia:Disruptive communities

In a nutshell: You should NOT link to, post in or be a member of genuinely terrorist/pedophilic/zoophilic/zoosadist sites, servers, groups or you will get banned from SNCApedia (and potentially get arrested in real life)

There are some communities that SNCApedia editors are prohibited from participating in (as in posting in those communities or being a member of those communities), and those communities are widely called "hostile" or "disruptive" (off-site) communities because of sharty's "Participation in hostile or disruptive off-site communities is FORBIDDEN." rule which targets unwanted communities, even if they aren't literally hostile or disruptive in practice (note that a community being considered "hostile/disruptive" by sharty's staff does NOT automatically mean that it's participants are also not welcomed on SNCApedia)

Such communities must also not be linked on SNCApedia (in some egregious examples of sites that allow illegal content even hinting to what their domain is may be prohibited)

Wether a certain community is "hostile/ disruptive" in relation to this site is decided by the SNCApedia moderators, and there is general consensus on what makes a community «hostile and/or disruptive» to SNCApedia:

1. Content that violates or encouragements to violate US law being allowed in the community by the moderation team (In practice, this refers almost exclusively to CSEM, animal abuse content, terrorism and swatting. Nobody cares about places that allow copyright violating content for example but you should NOT post specific links to copyright-violating content).
2. Community and/or community's staff being genuinely pedophilic, zoophilic or posting/comitting/promoting/allowing animal abuse and child sexual abuse in practice, footage of such abuse especially zoosadist content.
3. Community and/or community's staff themselves posting illegal, pedophilic, zoophilic and animal abuse content on SNCApedia or other sites, or encouraging to post such content.
4. Community and/or community's staff encouraging disruptive actions against SNCApedia such as vandalism or DDoSing.

Participants of communities that are simply critical of SNCApedia but do not fit the criteria listed above are allowed to edit SNCApedia. Communities that ban their members for commiting actions in the listed criteria are not considered hostile/disruptive.

Those criteria are generally applied to communities that are a part of or related to soysphere, communities that are niche (such as some discord servers) and communities centered on being (pro-)pedophilic/zoophilic/zoosadist specifically («failtroll» sites, pedophile forums and etc.). Owner of kiwifarms admitting to like shota, Elon Musk being in Epstein files, 4chan administration allowing pedophilic content and etc. doesn't mean that participants of the sites they own are banned from editing SNCApedia as those are big, popular and have a diverse userbase.

Lurking in those communities (if they are open to see) is allowed but is very discouraged due to likelihood of users seeing illegal and other bad content (it is VERY recommended to disable images and videos in browser (click to see a guide on how to do that) when visiting pedo/zoophilic or poorly unmoderated sites.) and due to hostile site's owners collecting your user information (IP adress, search history and user fingerprint) that they may leak or otherwise use against you (It is VERY recommended to only visit disruptive sites from a VPN and with a spoofed fingerprint/from a device that you don't use for your other online sessions, or a virtual machine).

There is a significant possibility of an unwanted community or a person being mentioned in a negative light resulting in the said community/individual trying to target SNCApedia or it's users with vandalism and doxing, the first being nearly solved by the manual edit approval, and the second one being partly avoidable by ONLY editing/creating pages on or discussing disruptive off-siters and their communities from an alt account that does not mention or hint to real identity of the alt account owner or what other accounts and online identities person behind the alt account uses (heavily recommended).

Pages about groups that are considered hostile in regards to SNCApedia have a Template:Hostile on them (distinct from Template:Hostilesharty which is for sites that considered hostile by the current sharty administration specifically) as well as a "Hostile Community" category which pages about people and things related to those communities have too (distinct from Category:Banned Websites on the Sharty which is for sites banned on Quote-owned sites but not SNCApedia).

All sites considered hostile/disruptive in regards to SNCApedia are also considered disruptive by Quote administration and most non-failtroll splinters (meaning that you should not add Template:Hostilesharty and Category:Banned Websites on the Sharty on pages that already have Template:Hostile and/or Category:Hostile Community, because it is redundant) and their participants are ought to be banned from sharty, Soyjak Wiki, Soybooru, Sharty's irc and the non-failtroll splinters (due to sncapedia's strict criteria), however the opposite is often not the case.