User talk:Powersky

Rare example of a Gemmy furry

The only other gemmy furry is Yahoo beb Channel of the Sith (talk) 21:43, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

@Powersky

I'm tired of the fooeykikes, I was planning into making the articles related to the sites more vooey centric or something.

whats your opinion on that? Yaquer200 (talk) 21:50, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Make that it’s own topic beb Channel of the Sith (talk) 21:52, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

help i cant use the captcha -powersky @yaquer200 yeah thats a good idea since the fooey is a dnb

I also wanted to talk about perhaps censoring their domain, their site it's just esentially a 4cuck clone with little to no soyjak aspect and only relevant because of the owner. Not only that but the owner of the site was spotted on a pedocord with failtrolls and his site seems to be filled with pedophilic posts type about cunny, we recently censored the chinny's domain so I don't want to people think this is a quotecord site or whatever but unlike the chinny i don't think the people doing those posts have any hint or irony or excuses and i don't think many people would care if it gets censored. Most furfags that were actual sharty users are on the vooey anyways, your domain is secured in this site. Tell me what do you think? I'm also giving you automoderated because i know you and you're obviously someone who won't cause trouble. Yaquer200 (talk) 22:35, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Not sure if censoring the domain will bring much since they already shill a lot on twitter and it's not hard to find them. Still, if you think it's a good decision then absolutely go for it, that site is a rotting 100pph carcass anyway. Powersky (talk) 22:44, 22 March 2026 (UTC)