SNCApedia:Disruptive communities - Revision history

SECA Enthusiast: Protected "SNCApedia:Disruptive communities" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))

2026-04-16T09:43:12Z

Protected "SNCApedia:Disruptive communities" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))

← Older revision	Revision as of 09:43, 16 April 2026
(No difference)

Editor: Text replacement - "SNCAPedia" to "SNCApedia"

2026-03-29T22:59:08Z

Text replacement - "SNCAPedia" to "SNCApedia"

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:59, 29 March 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<big><big><big>'''In a nutshell: You should NOT link to, post in or be a member of genuinely terrorist/pedophilic/zoophilic/zoosadist sites, servers, groups or you will get banned from SNCApedia and most Soysphere sites (and potentially get arrested in real life)'''</big></big></big>		<big><big><big>'''In a nutshell: You should NOT link to, post in or be a member of genuinely terrorist/pedophilic/zoophilic/zoosadist sites, servers, groups or you will get banned from SNCApedia and most Soysphere sites (and potentially get arrested in real life)'''</big></big></big>

	There are some communities that SNCApedia editors are [[~~SNCAPedia~~:Rules\|prohibited from ''participating in'']] (as in posting in those communities or being a member of those communities), and those communities are widely called "hostile" or "disruptive" (off-site) communities because of sharty's "Participation in hostile or disruptive off-site communities is FORBIDDEN." rule which targets unwanted communities, even if they aren't literally hostile or disruptive in practice (note that a community being considered "hostile/disruptive" by sharty's staff does NOT automatically mean that it's participants are also not welcomed on SNCApedia)		There are some communities that SNCApedia editors are [[SNCApedia:Rules\|prohibited from ''participating in'']] (as in posting in those communities or being a member of those communities), and those communities are widely called "hostile" or "disruptive" (off-site) communities because of sharty's "Participation in hostile or disruptive off-site communities is FORBIDDEN." rule which targets unwanted communities, even if they aren't literally hostile or disruptive in practice (note that a community being considered "hostile/disruptive" by sharty's staff does NOT automatically mean that it's participants are also not welcomed on SNCApedia)

	Such communities must also not be linked on SNCApedia (in some egregious examples of sites that allow illegal content even hinting to what their domain is may be prohibited, even if the hosting and/or domain has terminated operations).		Such communities must also not be linked on SNCApedia (in some egregious examples of sites that allow illegal content even hinting to what their domain is may be prohibited, even if the hosting and/or domain has terminated operations).

Pncalover at 02:39, 20 March 2026

2026-03-20T02:39:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:39, 20 March 2026
Line 22:		Line 22:
	Those criteria are generally applied to communities that are a part of or related to soysphere, communities that are niche (such as some discord servers) and communities centered on being (pro-)pedophilic/zoophilic/zoosadist specifically («failtroll» sites, pedophile forums and etc.). [[Null\|Owner of KiwiFarms]] admitting to like shota, Elon Musk being in Epstein files, 4chan administration allowing pedophilic content and etc. doesn't mean that participants of the sites they own are banned from editing SNCApedia as those are big, popular and have a diverse userbase.		Those criteria are generally applied to communities that are a part of or related to soysphere, communities that are niche (such as some discord servers) and communities centered on being (pro-)pedophilic/zoophilic/zoosadist specifically («failtroll» sites, pedophile forums and etc.). [[Null\|Owner of KiwiFarms]] admitting to like shota, Elon Musk being in Epstein files, 4chan administration allowing pedophilic content and etc. doesn't mean that participants of the sites they own are banned from editing SNCApedia as those are big, popular and have a diverse userbase.

	Lurking in those communities (if they are open to see) is allowed but is very discouraged due to likelihood of users seeing illegal and other bad content ('''it is VERY recommended to disable images and videos in browser ([https://cleanbrowsing.org/help/docs/disable-images-in-browser/ click to see a guide on how to do that]) when visiting pedo/zoophilic or poorly unmoderated sites.''') and due to hostile site's owners potentially collecting your user information (IP adress, search history and user fingerprint) that they may leak or otherwise use against you '''(It is VERY recommended to only visit disruptive sites from a VPN or TOR and with a spoofed fingerprint/from a device that you don't use for your other online sessions, or a virtual machine, like [https://tails.net/ Tails OS]).		Lurking in those communities (if they are open to see) is allowed but is very discouraged due to likelihood of users seeing illegal and other bad content ('''it is VERY recommended to disable images and videos in browser ([https://cleanbrowsing.org/help/docs/disable-images-in-browser/ click to see a guide on how to do that], [[User:Landfill/How_to_disable_images_in_Firefox_Mobile\|a mobile version for phonefags]]) when visiting pedo/zoophilic or poorly unmoderated sites.''') and due to hostile site's owners potentially collecting your user information (IP adress, search history and user fingerprint) that they may leak or otherwise use against you '''(It is VERY recommended to only visit disruptive sites from a VPN or TOR and with a spoofed fingerprint/from a device that you don't use for your other online sessions, or a virtual machine, like [https://tails.net/ Tails OS]).

	There is a significant possibility of an unwanted community or a person being mentioned in a negative light resulting in the said community/individual trying to target SNCApedia or it's users with vandalism and doxing, the first being nearly solved by the manual edit approval, and the second one being partly avoidable by '''ONLY editing/creating pages on or discussing disruptive off-siters and their communities from an alt account that does not mention or hint to real identity of the alt account owner or what other accounts and online identities person behind the alt account uses along with using [[Tor\|TOR]], preferably with javascript off(heavily recommended).'''		There is a significant possibility of an unwanted community or a person being mentioned in a negative light resulting in the said community/individual trying to target SNCApedia or it's users with vandalism and doxing, the first being nearly solved by the manual edit approval, and the second one being partly avoidable by '''ONLY editing/creating pages on or discussing disruptive off-siters and their communities from an alt account that does not mention or hint to real identity of the alt account owner or what other accounts and online identities person behind the alt account uses along with using [[Tor\|TOR]], preferably with javascript off(heavily recommended).'''

Editor at 21:17, 18 March 2026

2026-03-18T21:17:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:17, 18 March 2026
Line 33:		Line 33:
	* [[sharty:Hostility\|Hostility]]		* [[sharty:Hostility\|Hostility]]
	* [[sharty:Failtroll\|Failtroll]] - term for retards who raid using shock content such as animal gore and 'p.		* [[sharty:Failtroll\|Failtroll]] - term for retards who raid using shock content such as animal gore and 'p.

			{{SNCApedia footer}}

Pncalover at 12:55, 18 March 2026

2026-03-18T12:55:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:55, 18 March 2026
Line 24:		Line 24:
	Lurking in those communities (if they are open to see) is allowed but is very discouraged due to likelihood of users seeing illegal and other bad content ('''it is VERY recommended to disable images and videos in browser ([https://cleanbrowsing.org/help/docs/disable-images-in-browser/ click to see a guide on how to do that]) when visiting pedo/zoophilic or poorly unmoderated sites.''') and due to hostile site's owners potentially collecting your user information (IP adress, search history and user fingerprint) that they may leak or otherwise use against you '''(It is VERY recommended to only visit disruptive sites from a VPN or TOR and with a spoofed fingerprint/from a device that you don't use for your other online sessions, or a virtual machine, like [https://tails.net/ Tails OS]).		Lurking in those communities (if they are open to see) is allowed but is very discouraged due to likelihood of users seeing illegal and other bad content ('''it is VERY recommended to disable images and videos in browser ([https://cleanbrowsing.org/help/docs/disable-images-in-browser/ click to see a guide on how to do that]) when visiting pedo/zoophilic or poorly unmoderated sites.''') and due to hostile site's owners potentially collecting your user information (IP adress, search history and user fingerprint) that they may leak or otherwise use against you '''(It is VERY recommended to only visit disruptive sites from a VPN or TOR and with a spoofed fingerprint/from a device that you don't use for your other online sessions, or a virtual machine, like [https://tails.net/ Tails OS]).

	There is a significant possibility of an unwanted community or a person being mentioned in a negative light resulting in the said community/individual trying to target SNCApedia or it's users with vandalism and doxing, the first being nearly solved by the manual edit approval, and the second one being partly avoidable by '''ONLY editing/creating pages on or discussing disruptive off-siters and their communities from an alt account that does not mention or hint to real identity of the alt account owner or what other accounts and online identities person behind the alt account uses along with using [[TOR]], preferably with javascript off(heavily recommended).'''		There is a significant possibility of an unwanted community or a person being mentioned in a negative light resulting in the said community/individual trying to target SNCApedia or it's users with vandalism and doxing, the first being nearly solved by the manual edit approval, and the second one being partly avoidable by '''ONLY editing/creating pages on or discussing disruptive off-siters and their communities from an alt account that does not mention or hint to real identity of the alt account owner or what other accounts and online identities person behind the alt account uses along with using [[Tor\|TOR]], preferably with javascript off(heavily recommended).'''

	Pages about groups that are considered hostile in regards to SNCApedia have a [[Template:Hostile]] on them (distinct from [[Template:Hostilesharty]] which is for sites that considered hostile by the current sharty administration specifically) as well as a "''Hostile Community''" category which pages about people and things related to those communities have too (distinct from ''Category:Banned Websites on the Sharty'' which is for sites banned on Quote-owned sites but not SNCApedia).		Pages about groups that are considered hostile in regards to SNCApedia have a [[Template:Hostile]] on them (distinct from [[Template:Hostilesharty]] which is for sites that considered hostile by the current sharty administration specifically) as well as a "''Hostile Community''" category which pages about people and things related to those communities have too (distinct from ''Category:Banned Websites on the Sharty'' which is for sites banned on Quote-owned sites but not SNCApedia).

Pncalover at 12:55, 18 March 2026

2026-03-18T12:55:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:55, 18 March 2026
Line 24:		Line 24:
	Lurking in those communities (if they are open to see) is allowed but is very discouraged due to likelihood of users seeing illegal and other bad content ('''it is VERY recommended to disable images and videos in browser ([https://cleanbrowsing.org/help/docs/disable-images-in-browser/ click to see a guide on how to do that]) when visiting pedo/zoophilic or poorly unmoderated sites.''') and due to hostile site's owners potentially collecting your user information (IP adress, search history and user fingerprint) that they may leak or otherwise use against you '''(It is VERY recommended to only visit disruptive sites from a VPN or TOR and with a spoofed fingerprint/from a device that you don't use for your other online sessions, or a virtual machine, like [https://tails.net/ Tails OS]).		Lurking in those communities (if they are open to see) is allowed but is very discouraged due to likelihood of users seeing illegal and other bad content ('''it is VERY recommended to disable images and videos in browser ([https://cleanbrowsing.org/help/docs/disable-images-in-browser/ click to see a guide on how to do that]) when visiting pedo/zoophilic or poorly unmoderated sites.''') and due to hostile site's owners potentially collecting your user information (IP adress, search history and user fingerprint) that they may leak or otherwise use against you '''(It is VERY recommended to only visit disruptive sites from a VPN or TOR and with a spoofed fingerprint/from a device that you don't use for your other online sessions, or a virtual machine, like [https://tails.net/ Tails OS]).

	There is a significant possibility of an unwanted community or a person being mentioned in a negative light resulting in the said community/individual trying to target SNCApedia or it's users with vandalism and doxing, the first being nearly solved by the manual edit approval, and the second one being partly avoidable by '''ONLY editing/creating pages on or discussing disruptive off-siters and their communities from an alt account that does not mention or hint to real identity of the alt account owner or what other accounts and online identities person behind the alt account uses (heavily recommended).'''		There is a significant possibility of an unwanted community or a person being mentioned in a negative light resulting in the said community/individual trying to target SNCApedia or it's users with vandalism and doxing, the first being nearly solved by the manual edit approval, and the second one being partly avoidable by '''ONLY editing/creating pages on or discussing disruptive off-siters and their communities from an alt account that does not mention or hint to real identity of the alt account owner or what other accounts and online identities person behind the alt account uses along with using [[TOR]], preferably with javascript off(heavily recommended).'''

	Pages about groups that are considered hostile in regards to SNCApedia have a [[Template:Hostile]] on them (distinct from [[Template:Hostilesharty]] which is for sites that considered hostile by the current sharty administration specifically) as well as a "''Hostile Community''" category which pages about people and things related to those communities have too (distinct from ''Category:Banned Websites on the Sharty'' which is for sites banned on Quote-owned sites but not SNCApedia).		Pages about groups that are considered hostile in regards to SNCApedia have a [[Template:Hostile]] on them (distinct from [[Template:Hostilesharty]] which is for sites that considered hostile by the current sharty administration specifically) as well as a "''Hostile Community''" category which pages about people and things related to those communities have too (distinct from ''Category:Banned Websites on the Sharty'' which is for sites banned on Quote-owned sites but not SNCApedia).

Pncalover: fix

2026-03-18T12:50:07Z

fix

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:50, 18 March 2026
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Such communities must also not be linked on SNCApedia (in some egregious examples of sites that allow illegal content even hinting to what their domain is may be prohibited, even if the hosting and/or domain has terminated operations).		Such communities must also not be linked on SNCApedia (in some egregious examples of sites that allow illegal content even hinting to what their domain is may be prohibited, even if the hosting and/or domain has terminated operations).

	~~Wether~~ a certain community is "hostile/		Whether a certain community is "hostile/
	disruptive" in relation to this site is decided by the SNCApedia moderators, and there is general consensus on <big>'''what makes a community «hostile and/or disruptive» to SNCApedia:'''</big>		disruptive" in relation to this site is decided by the SNCApedia moderators, and there is general consensus on <big>'''what makes a community «hostile and/or disruptive» to SNCApedia:'''</big>

Pncalover at 12:41, 18 March 2026

2026-03-18T12:41:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:41, 18 March 2026
Line 20:		Line 20:
	Communities that ban their members for commiting actions in the listed criteria are not considered hostile/disruptive.		Communities that ban their members for commiting actions in the listed criteria are not considered hostile/disruptive.

	Those criteria are generally applied to communities that are a part of or related to soysphere, communities that are niche (such as some discord servers) and communities centered on being (pro-)pedophilic/zoophilic/zoosadist specifically («failtroll» sites, pedophile forums and etc.). [[Null\|Owner of ~~kiwifarms~~]] admitting to like shota, Elon Musk being in Epstein files, 4chan administration allowing pedophilic content and etc. doesn't mean that participants of the sites they own are banned from editing SNCApedia as those are big, popular and have a diverse userbase.		Those criteria are generally applied to communities that are a part of or related to soysphere, communities that are niche (such as some discord servers) and communities centered on being (pro-)pedophilic/zoophilic/zoosadist specifically («failtroll» sites, pedophile forums and etc.). [[Null\|Owner of KiwiFarms]] admitting to like shota, Elon Musk being in Epstein files, 4chan administration allowing pedophilic content and etc. doesn't mean that participants of the sites they own are banned from editing SNCApedia as those are big, popular and have a diverse userbase.

	Lurking in those communities (if they are open to see) is allowed but is very discouraged due to likelihood of users seeing illegal and other bad content ('''it is VERY recommended to disable images and videos in browser ([https://cleanbrowsing.org/help/docs/disable-images-in-browser/ click to see a guide on how to do that]) when visiting pedo/zoophilic or poorly unmoderated sites.''') and due to hostile site's owners potentially collecting your user information (IP adress, search history and user fingerprint) that they may leak or otherwise use against you '''(It is VERY recommended to only visit disruptive sites from a VPN or TOR and with a spoofed fingerprint/from a device that you don't use for your other online sessions, or a virtual machine, like [[https://tails.net/\|Tails OS]]).		Lurking in those communities (if they are open to see) is allowed but is very discouraged due to likelihood of users seeing illegal and other bad content ('''it is VERY recommended to disable images and videos in browser ([https://cleanbrowsing.org/help/docs/disable-images-in-browser/ click to see a guide on how to do that]) when visiting pedo/zoophilic or poorly unmoderated sites.''') and due to hostile site's owners potentially collecting your user information (IP adress, search history and user fingerprint) that they may leak or otherwise use against you '''(It is VERY recommended to only visit disruptive sites from a VPN or TOR and with a spoofed fingerprint/from a device that you don't use for your other online sessions, or a virtual machine, like [https://tails.net/ Tails OS]).

	There is a significant possibility of an unwanted community or a person being mentioned in a negative light resulting in the said community/individual trying to target SNCApedia or it's users with vandalism and doxing, the first being nearly solved by the manual edit approval, and the second one being partly avoidable by '''ONLY editing/creating pages on or discussing disruptive off-siters and their communities from an alt account that does not mention or hint to real identity of the alt account owner or what other accounts and online identities person behind the alt account uses (heavily recommended).'''		There is a significant possibility of an unwanted community or a person being mentioned in a negative light resulting in the said community/individual trying to target SNCApedia or it's users with vandalism and doxing, the first being nearly solved by the manual edit approval, and the second one being partly avoidable by '''ONLY editing/creating pages on or discussing disruptive off-siters and their communities from an alt account that does not mention or hint to real identity of the alt account owner or what other accounts and online identities person behind the alt account uses (heavily recommended).'''

Pncalover: Fix

2026-03-18T12:38:39Z

Fix

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:38, 18 March 2026
Line 22:		Line 22:
	Those criteria are generally applied to communities that are a part of or related to soysphere, communities that are niche (such as some discord servers) and communities centered on being (pro-)pedophilic/zoophilic/zoosadist specifically («failtroll» sites, pedophile forums and etc.). [[Null\|Owner of kiwifarms]] admitting to like shota, Elon Musk being in Epstein files, 4chan administration allowing pedophilic content and etc. doesn't mean that participants of the sites they own are banned from editing SNCApedia as those are big, popular and have a diverse userbase.		Those criteria are generally applied to communities that are a part of or related to soysphere, communities that are niche (such as some discord servers) and communities centered on being (pro-)pedophilic/zoophilic/zoosadist specifically («failtroll» sites, pedophile forums and etc.). [[Null\|Owner of kiwifarms]] admitting to like shota, Elon Musk being in Epstein files, 4chan administration allowing pedophilic content and etc. doesn't mean that participants of the sites they own are banned from editing SNCApedia as those are big, popular and have a diverse userbase.

	Lurking in those communities (if they are open to see) is allowed but is very discouraged due to likelihood of users seeing illegal and other bad content ('''it is VERY recommended to disable images and videos in browser ([https://cleanbrowsing.org/help/docs/disable-images-in-browser/ click to see a guide on how to do that]) when visiting pedo/zoophilic or poorly unmoderated sites.''') and due to hostile site's owners potentially collecting your user information (IP adress, search history and user fingerprint) that they may leak or otherwise use against you '''(It is VERY recommended to only visit disruptive sites from a VPN or TOR and with a spoofed fingerprint/from a device that you don't use for your other online sessions, or a virtual machine).		Lurking in those communities (if they are open to see) is allowed but is very discouraged due to likelihood of users seeing illegal and other bad content ('''it is VERY recommended to disable images and videos in browser ([https://cleanbrowsing.org/help/docs/disable-images-in-browser/ click to see a guide on how to do that]) when visiting pedo/zoophilic or poorly unmoderated sites.''') and due to hostile site's owners potentially collecting your user information (IP adress, search history and user fingerprint) that they may leak or otherwise use against you '''(It is VERY recommended to only visit disruptive sites from a VPN or TOR and with a spoofed fingerprint/from a device that you don't use for your other online sessions, or a virtual machine, like [[https://tails.net/\|Tails OS]]).

	There is a significant possibility of an unwanted community or a person being mentioned in a negative light resulting in the said community/individual trying to target SNCApedia or it's users with vandalism and doxing, the first being nearly solved by the manual edit approval, and the second one being partly avoidable by '''ONLY editing/creating pages on or discussing disruptive off-siters and their communities from an alt account that does not mention or hint to real identity of the alt account owner or what other accounts and online identities person behind the alt account uses (heavily recommended).'''		There is a significant possibility of an unwanted community or a person being mentioned in a negative light resulting in the said community/individual trying to target SNCApedia or it's users with vandalism and doxing, the first being nearly solved by the manual edit approval, and the second one being partly avoidable by '''ONLY editing/creating pages on or discussing disruptive off-siters and their communities from an alt account that does not mention or hint to real identity of the alt account owner or what other accounts and online identities person behind the alt account uses (heavily recommended).'''
Line 31:		Line 31:

	==See also==		==See also==
	* [[sharty:Hostility]]		* [[sharty:Hostility\|Hostility]]
	* [[sharty:Failtroll]] - term for retards who raid using shock content such as animal gore and 'p.		* [[sharty:Failtroll\|Failtroll]] - term for retards who raid using shock content such as animal gore and 'p.

Pncalover: added a rule about soycords

2026-03-18T11:58:04Z

added a rule about soycords

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:58, 18 March 2026
Line 12:		Line 12:
	#'''Community and/or community's staff being genuinely pedophilic, zoophilic or posting/comitting/promoting/allowing animal abuse and child sexual abuse in practice, footage of such abuse especially zoosadist content.'''		#'''Community and/or community's staff being genuinely pedophilic, zoophilic or posting/comitting/promoting/allowing animal abuse and child sexual abuse in practice, footage of such abuse especially zoosadist content.'''
	#'''Community and/or community's staff themselves posting illegal, pedophilic, zoophilic and animal abuse content on SNCApedia or other sites, or encouraging to post such content.'''		#'''Community and/or community's staff themselves posting illegal, pedophilic, zoophilic and animal abuse content on SNCApedia or other sites, or encouraging to post such content.'''
	#'''Community and/or community's staff encouraging disruptive actions against SNCApedia such as vandalism or DDoSing.'''</big>		#'''Community and/or community's staff encouraging disruptive actions against SNCApedia such as vandalism or DDoSing.'''
			#'''Soyjak-related servers or channels on Discord or Telegram (except for the [[Sharty:Dailyjak\|Dailyjak]]) respectively.'''</big>

	These communities are often related to some kind of [[Discord]] server or [[Telegram]], even if it appears to be regular looking on the surface (e.g. the [[Noy]], [[Gassy]], [[Zelty]]). Some of those imageboards noticably contain brimstone content such as pornography or even shock content.		These communities are often related to some kind of [[Discord]] server or [[Telegram]], even if it appears to be regular looking on the surface (e.g. the [[Noy]], [[Gassy]], [[Zelty]]). Some of those imageboards noticably contain brimstone content such as pornography or even shock content.